Favorite IDE?

Pages: 1... 345
closed account (S6k9GNh0)
Ease of use, portability, effecient design? That's the whole point of wrapping a low-level API...
I wonder what happens when Microsoft develop a linux/mac wrapper that has exactly the same signature as the WINAPI.. Well of course that might not be possible because of some design issues or things like.. Just a weird vision of mine.
closed account (1yR4jE8b)
Ease of use and efficient design have nothing to do with the toolkit used, and are subjective and dependant on the programmer and techniques applied. Personally, I find wrapping C functions in C++ classes just pointless, and I have always prefered just using C bindings instead of wasting my time writing pointless classes for everything.

And some people just don't give a crap about portability. I'm currently in the process of writing cross-platform software for a work contract, and it's the most aggravating sh*t ever even with a cross-platform toolkit. If I had the choice to write only for Windows, I would.
I tend to write code that works on Linux and then rely on MinGW or Cygwin for Windows. I check that MinGW has all the header files I used.
closed account (1yR4jE8b)
I write for Windows first, I find it easier to port to Linux/Mac from Windows much easier than the opposite.
closed account (z05DSL3A)
I'm not that big a fan of cross platform UI toolkits. I usually end up having more work to do, especially if you want to do something that is not in the toolkit.
closed account (S6k9GNh0)
I never said that they are easy to make. That doesn't mean they contribute to having slow execution speed or bloat.

EDIT: I use cross-platform libraries such as Boost. If I need platform specific function, I have two separate files and then figure out which to use at compile time.
Last edited on
I use Visual Studio 2010 Professional. I have a MSDN subscription so I get all that stuff for free. If I'm on another computer I typically run devC++ off a flash drive or something.
Dev-C++. Because if I can't accomplish something it's either my own fault, or C++'s. The IDE is innocent.
closed account (z05DSL3A)
Dev-C++ is a pile of buggy crap, I'd rather work on a CLI than use that.
Sure it is. Where's Albatross when you need him.
I use eclipse ( http://eclipse.org ).

I have tried, from time to time, other IDE's (on Linux) but nothing works as well for me. It is a little complex to configure at times, but that is probably because I'm often too eager to read the manual.

Functionally it is great.

closed account (1yR4jE8b)
You really can't do much better than Visual Studio or Eclipse.
XCode.
Great Code Completion.
Lot's of features, SVN, CVS, debugging tools.........
XCode's Debugger sucks.
closed account (1yR4jE8b)
Well, pretty much every debugger sucks compared to Visual Studio's ;)
C::B's one is pretty neat.
@Darkest: Hey how well does VS's debugger handle multithreaded programs?
Topic archived. No new replies allowed.
Pages: 1... 345