Another Recommend a Browser Thread
Pages: 12
| This is what I hate about most the clickbaiting world. They will go as so far to sexualise people in order to get attention. They are derogatory, degrading and are among the more frequent objectifiers in today's doomed earth. |
Sex is built into us like that, they know it works. I don't think the Earth is doomed either.
closed account (367kGNh0)
| they know it works. |
Are you saying this as an argument against me or an explanation to my distaste?
Of all the things to get offended by, the sexualization of adults is one of the most stupid.
In agreement with Helios. It happens, with consent, and no one seems to mind. Lots of sexual things partners will usually do will probably seem degrading as well, but I think that's natural.
I say it as in that's why they do it.
| Are you saying this as an argument against me or an explanation to my distaste? |
I say it as in that's why they do it.
closed account (367kGNh0)
| Of all the things to get offended by, the sexualization of adults is one of the most stupid. |
Last edited on
closed account (367kGNh0)
| Why do you despise it? |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2mhQf8RjQs
In a sense these degrading images are pornography, just a little less extreme in comparison to, god forbid, what twisted teenagers are watching. One pornography user is too many in general. We should be watching baking shows, ted talks, and to suggest from experience, a language course from Michel Thomas etc ideally, so we can expand our brains rather than shrink them
Also, I despise how due to the lack of regulation for what goes on the news feed thumbnail images, these pathetic websites can slip an inappropriate image before the eyes of an under 12, just for opening the browser! And they probably already have 500k+ times
Last edited on
| We are supposed to be harmed, we were NOT however supposed to view enticing images of other beings |
First, so given the choice you'd rather be punched in the face than be shown a sexually arousing picture?
Second, "supposed to be"? According to whose edict?
| We should be watching baking shows, ted talks, and to suggest from experience, a language course from Michel Thomas etc ideally, so we can expand our brains rather than shrink them |
Also, why can't we do both? Why can't someone watch whatever it is you've arbitrarily deemed acceptable and then put on a porno? Or are you saying every second of our waking lives should be filled with baking shows, TED talks, and documentaries?
| these pathetic websites can slip an inappropriate image before the eyes of an under 12, just for opening the browser! |
Oh, no. Kids with erections. What's the world coming to?
Hell, if my kid looked at a bare nipple, I'd take him to the basement and give him a good belting. And none of that pansy five or ten, either; as hard as I can until I can't lift my arm anymore. That's what you said, right? People are supposed to be harmed, not aroused.
Jesus, man. And you have the balls to call teenagers "twisted".
PS: Sorry about the tangent, Duthomhas. I'll leave this here. If Rascake wants to continue they can create another thread, but I won't respond in this one.
Last edited on
closed account (367kGNh0)
| I won't respond in this one. |
Last edited on
I am distressed that my threads always seem to go off the rails on stuff like this.
I am still working on accepting the inevitability.
I am still working on accepting the inevitability.
closed account (367kGNh0)
| I am distressed |
Last edited on
| Show me a high traffic forum in which this occurrence is 100% absent and I will give you the ideal world |
Show me some self control and I won’t say anything about thread derailment.
Topic archived. No new replies allowed.
Pages: 12